Adopted by courts and tribunals in unfair dismissal cases

Assignment Help Other Subject

Reference no: EM133812864

Question

What does this mean in short explanation, This approach would accord, in its result, with the approach adopted by courts and tribunals in unfair dismissal cases when exercising the statutory jurisdiction, currently limited to a maximum of £11,300, to award an amount of compensation which the court or tribunal considers "just and reasonable" in all the circumstances. Writing on a clean slate, the courts have interpreted this as enabling awards to include compensation in respect of the manner and circumstances of dismissal if these would give rise to a risk of financial loss by, for instance, making the employee less acceptable to potential employers: see sections 123 and 124 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and Norton Tool Co. Ltd. v. Tewson [1973] 1 W.L.R. 45.

Reference no: EM133812864

Questions Cloud

Employee as result of breach of the trust : What does this mean. Exceptionally, however, the losses suffered by an employee as a result of a breach of the trust and confidence term may not consist

Statement about divorce mediation : Select the true statement about divorce mediation. Divorce mediation is more efficient and cost-effective than court.

Describe what it means to be an authentic leader : In your own words, describe what it means to be an authentic leader. Why is authenticity important for leaders? Provide two reasons.

What steps will you take to assure the necessary supports : What steps will you take to assure the necessary supports and resources that will be needed? What barriers do you anticipate along the journey

Adopted by courts and tribunals in unfair dismissal cases : What does this mean in short explanation, This approach would accord, in its result, with the approach adopted by courts and tribunals in unfair dismissal cases

Calls characterwitness who testifies : Suppose the D chooses not to testify but calls a characterwitness who testifies that he knows the defendant well andthat she is upright and extremely ethical.

Do you think andrea yates qualifies as legally : Do you think Andrea Yates qualifies as legally (not medically or psychologically) insane? Explain, using evidence.

Prosecution of gerald for bank robbery : In a prosecution of Gerald for bank robbery, Gerald'sneighbor Max testifies that Gerald boasted of carrying out the robbery.

Negligent infliction of emotional distress : The factual differences change the outcome of whether the plaintiff would succeed in a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress.

User Account

All Pages