Reference no: EM133537228

Question: Methamphetamine (meth) is an addictive drug made chiefly in small toxic labs (STLs) in homes, tents, barns, and hotel rooms. The manufacturing process is dangerous, often resulting in explosions, burns, and toxic fumes. Government entities spend time and resources to find and destroy STLs, imprison meth dealers and users, treat addicts, and provide services for affected families.

Meth cannot be made without ingredients that are also used in cold and allergy medications. Arkansas has one of the highest numbers of STLs in the United States. To recoup the costs of fighting the meth epidemic, twenty counties in Arkansas filed a suit against Pfizer, Inc., which makes cold and allergy medications. They argued that it was Pfizer's ethical responsibility to either stop using the ingredients in their cold and allergy medications that can be used to make meth or to compensate the government for the amount it spends closing down meth labs. (See Ethics and the Role of Business, Ethical Principles and Philosophies, and Making Ethical Business Decisions.)

First, outline Pfizer's ethical responsibility under the corporate social responsibility doctrine. To whom does Pfizer owe duties?

Second, formulate an argument on behalf of Pfizer that the company has not breached any of its ethical responsibilities.

Third, assume that you work for Pfizer and that the company is trying to determine the best course of action to prevent its medications from being used to make meth. Apply the IDDR approach and explain the steps in the reasoning used.

Last, adopt a utilitarian point of view and perform a cost-benefit analysis to determine what the company should do. Specifically, should the company pay compensation to the state, or should it stop using certain ingredients in its medications? Make sure to explain your reasoning.