Reference no: EM131049081
The CEO of Dynamic Manufacturing was at a conference and talked to a supplier about a new piece of equipment for its production process that she believes will produce ongoing cost savings. As the Operations Manager, your CEO has asked for your perspective on whether or not to purchase the machinery. After talking to the supplier and meeting with your Engineers and Financial Analysts, you’ve gathered the following pieces of data: • Cost of Machine: $150,000 • Estimated Annual After Tax Cash Flow Savings: $65,000 (which may or may not grow) • Estimated machinery life: 3-5 years (after which there will be zero value for the equipment and no further cost savings) • You seem to recall that Dynamic’s Finance organization recommends either a 10% or a 15% discount rate for all Cost Savings Projects. From your JWMI MBA, you understand that you need to understand the project financials to ensure that this investment will be economically attractive to Dynamic Manufacturing’s shareholders. Calculate the Nominal Payback, the Discounted Payback, the Net Present Value and the IRR (so 4 answers for each scenario) assuming: • Alice (A) recommends using the base assumptions above: 3 year project life, flat annual savings, 10% discount rate • Bill (B) recommends savings that grow each year: 3 year project life, 10% discount rate and a 10% compounded annual savings growth in years 2 & 3. In other words, instead of assuming savings stay flat, assume that they will grow by 10% in year 2, and then grow another 10% over year 3 in year • Carla (C) believes we use a higher Discount Rate because of the risk of this type of project: 3 year project life, flat annual savings, 15% discount rate. • Danny (D) is convinced the machine will last longer than 3 years. He recommends using a 5 Year Equipment Life: 5 year project and savings life, flat annual savings, 10% discount rate. In other words, assume that the machine will last 2 more years and deliver 2 more years of savings. Discussion – in a Word Document in paragraph form, respond to the following: 1) Which person’s scenario would you present to management and why? From a strictly financial (numbers) perspective, would you recommend this purchase to management? 2) In your opinion, which person’s scenario is the most aggressive (i.e., is based on the most aggressive assumptions)? If you were to select this scenario as the basis for your proposal, how would you justify the more aggressive assumptions? 3) In SIMPLE English (as in talking to a non-Finance and non-MBA person), explain why there is value to management in running all 4 of these scenarios. 4) Beyond financial measures, what other considerations would you want to consider, before making a recommendation to management? 5) If you were the CEO, would you approve this proposal? Why or why not?
Issue of preferred stock outstanding-what is required return
: Moraine, Inc., has an issue of preferred stock outstanding that pays a dollar 6.35 dividend every year in perpetuity. If this issue currently sells for dollar 92 per share, what is the required return?
|
Mutually exclusive projects-the crossover rate for projects
: Swenson’s is considering two mutually exclusive projects, Projects A and B, and has determined that the crossover rate for these projects is 11.7 percent.
|
Declining balance depreciation method
: The net annual value added that can be attributed to this machine is constant over eight years and a mounts to $15,000. An effective income tax-rate of 40% is used by the company, and the before-tax MARR equals 25% per year. Use 150% Declining Bal..
|
Using relevant international marketing concepts
: Using relevant international marketing concepts, critically analyse the claim that a ‘glocalised' marketing approach is the key to success for international companies.
|
About new piece of equipment for its production process
: The CEO of Dynamic Manufacturing was at a conference and talked to a supplier about a new piece of equipment for its production process that she believes will produce ongoing cost savings. Beyond financial measures, what other considerations would yo..
|
Rolling out this new company-wide quality initiative
: Tasks for Part 2 will be completed in Week 5 and will be 250-300 words. The project deliverables for this week are as follows:Week 5: Roll-Out
|
The required rate of return on the market
: The risk-free rate of return is 6%, the required rate of return on the market is 10%, and High-Flyer stock has a beta coefficient of 2.5. If the dividend per share expected during the coming year, D1, is $2.20 and g = 5%, at what price should a share..
|
Impact on poverty reduction and viability
: Evaluate microfinance institutions (MFIs) of developing countries in terms of their performance (impact on poverty reduction) and viability (profitability). Provide four evidences (two for each – performance and viability) to support your answer. Ans..
|
Planning to develop new software
: Systems Software (P) Ltd. is planning to develop new software. It has identified the activities in the table below for this software development project and has calculated three time estimates in days for each of the activity.
|