Reference no: EM13730905

Janice Cullen, owner of a nationally renowned photography business, files a registration statement and prospectus with the SEC. Five days
after she files the registration statement, she has a meeting with her top 10 clients (primarily business owners who usually seek Janice for
marketing purposes). During this meeting, Janice distributes a red-herring prospectus. At the end of the meeting, Janice decides to sell
securities to her 10 clients, as well as 30 other clients with whom she had been emailing, despite the SEC's not having yet declared her
registration statement effective. Consequently, the SEC takes Janice to court for selling securities before the effective date of registration.
The court holds Janice liable for violating the 1933 Securities Act.

But what if the facts of the case were different? Select each set of facts below that could change the outcome of the case.
Janice's photography business was a registered non-profit, and focused on teaching art and photography in public schools. Her top 10
clients were owners of local charities.
Janice published a tombstone advertisement before meeting with her top 10 clients. They saw this advertisement and were eager to
engage in business with Janice.
The 40 clients who bought the securities from Janice were accredited investors.
Janice sold the securities to the 40 clients 25 days after she filed her registration statement