Reference no: EM13481352
A careful reading of Locke's notions about property development, spoilage, and so on, might lead you to conclude that he would be opposed to "excessive" capitalist development of real estate (i.e., say a Donald Trump tower on Miami-Dade wetlands), or perhaps the reverse.
General instructions:
The paper should be double-spaced, 1000 words long or longer (but not too much longer; quality, not quantity!).
Do NOT use web sample papers, SparkNotes, etc. to get ideas or for phrasing. Do NOT do secondary research via the internet or elsewhere.
Use whatever citation method for the primary text(s) that you have been taught in your Composition classes here at FIU or elsewhere. Or the one that you use in your own discipline/major. Be consistent in the method. For this first essay, there should be typically no other citations than for the primary text or author him/herself.
Do not provide a cover page; put your name/classname/date turned in/option#/your title at the top of the first page.
--Be prepared, should it be requested, to supply a draft stage of the essay (if you're wondering; this helps discourage plagiarism!). This means you must remember to permanently save a draft at some point as you are composing.
--Organization, quality of analysis, and style will all be factors in determining your grade, worth 25% of the course grade. Be sure to make a computer-disk backup.
The name of the book is : Locke, Second Treatise
A careful reading of Locke's notions about property development, spoilage, and so on, might lead you to conclude that he would be opposed to "excessive" capitalist development of real estate (i.e., say a Donald Trump tower on Miami-Dade wetlands), or perhaps the reverse. Explore to what extent you think Locke's ideas in The Second Treatiseare significant for arguments for or against large-scale real-estate development. This option provides an occasion to apply Locke's ideas (especially in Chapter V) to the contemporary reality of land development that we see all around us in South Florida. Is development always "industrious and rational," as Locke seems to imply, or can it sometimes represent "the covetousness of the quarrelsome and the contentious"? (Section 34). Does development always serve the common good or does it sometimes, or often, serve only the wealthy? (As with Option One: do not answer these questions per se; they are offered as brainstorming cues.) If you have some facts about Trump or South Florida real-estate from the internet, you may use them (in which case cite your source): this is an exception to the "no research" instructions above, and in general you should not be taking up much paper space with such.