"Personality Theories Assignment 2The terms “sex” and “gender” are a part of our everyday mundane experiences. Theseare terms that we use to distinguish if not discriminate based on the external appearances andbehavioural traits of the people who reside as cumulative parts of the society and contributein the procedure of taking forward the society into the next generation through sexual union.However the discrimination between these two words stays equally a misnomer for theaverage masses (Lane, 2011). Practically speaking they use it as a general term that can beused to refer the different sexual traits of individuals who reside in a society on parallel tracksand converge to take the population genetically forward through reproduction. The intricatemeanings of these two terms are however not as simultaneous as they seem. Terminologicalexplanation of these two words would show that the relationship between these two words isbasically that of cause and effect. While one serves as the causal antecedent the other acts asthe consequential effect.Researches show that if the distinction between the terms “Sex” and “gender” is askedto the masses, most will respond back with the question that if and are they not the samenames given to a single discriminating variable. In fact the purpose of these two words isoften interchanged through daily common conversations, as though “sex” is the synonym to“gender” and vice-e-versa. However such a thought is not rational, as explained fromanthropological, biological and psychological perspectives. An intent study of thesedisciplines, around the globe has explored newer dimensions that can explain the significanceof these terms better. The Medieval genre of the English Language explains the meaning of the term “sex”as a verb that relates to sectioning or in some cases, dividing. In Latin Terminology the term“Sex” is the name for the digit 6. On the other hand, the term “Gender” as well had a Personality Theories Assignment 3different meaning as was explained from the medieval English perspective. It relates to theold French term “Gene”. This particular term finds its origin in the Latin word, “Genus”(Lupien, & Juster, 2016). The term “genus” in Latin meant a certain kind, or a certain sortthat is seen among a cluster of commodities, or a certain selected population of humans.Modern science however discriminates these terms based on Biological aspects. Theterm “Sex” signifies the biological discriminations that can be seen in the individuals whoplay dominant gender roles that are played by the constituents of a society of humans.Thesetraits are inclusive of the chromosomal contents of the DNA of the individual under concern,the external genital traits, the nature of their reproductive system, their biological anatomy,their character traits, as well as their inherent expression techniques. On the other hand science explains the significance of “Gender” as only the sociallyconstructed character traits that the society where the individual lives and has grown up in,adheres to, as a protocol of distinction. Thus while “Sex” is the causal antecedent, “Gender” is the executed effect. Sex isdetermined biologically and is inherently present in the individual since birth. On the otherhand based on these sexual properties the “gender roles” are designed by the culture and thesociety where the individual has been born and brought up(Lane, 2011). In order to notresult into an anomaly or an out casted member of the society, it becomes necessary that theindividual follows the Gender roles that the society presents his or her “Sex” with, andfollows them from birth till death. Hence “Sex” is an inherent biological property, while “Gender” is defined based onthe culture or the society that the entity dwells in. The gender roles associated with the male Personality Theories Assignment 4and female sexes vary based on the culture that the individual lives in. These gender rolescast a great psychological and physical impact on the individual. For instance the idea of“Real Man” is not the same in every culture across the Globe. Similarly the idea of a “RealWomen” might vary from one culture to another.A real man refers to the male Sex andcertain masculine gender roles while a real woman requires being of the female sex and hasto adhere to certain feminine gender roles (Lupien, & Juster, 2016). It is these gender rolesthat vary among the several cultures around the globe and consequently differentiates thedefinitions of “Real Men” and “Real Women” among different cultures.The contradiction over the issue that whether more emphasis should be associatedwith the Sex of a person or the Gender roles that he or she is associated with has been aheated issue of debate in the contemporary times. The biological construction of a person ishis or her natural traits that he or she has no part to play in. It is an inherent property that isbased on the chromosomal content of the individual?s inherent DNA (Nasiruddin, 2013).However Gender and the roles associated with the same are social constructions. They aresynthetic as it is man-made and artificial. The debate thus greatly dwells upon the natureversus nurture domain of psychology. Over history several experiments have been procuredto nurture children of one gender to characteristically behave in the ways that are more usualto the members of the other sex that is a young boy is nurtured and taught the gestures,speaking disciplines that are usually associated with the female sex, and a girl child is madeto well in surroundings that nurtured her in ways that a male entity is used to (Mize, 2015).The resultant changes that occurred in the character traits of these children were theevidences to the fact that how adverse can the impact of Gender Roles be. The generalpopulation might consider such children to grow up into some monstrous, abnormal beingswho cannot be associated with the rest of the society. However, in most cases the outcomes Personality Theories Assignment 5hardly reflected the conflict between the biological hormonal traits of these children and theirbrought up that taught them their expressions and gestures. The gestures that seemedmasculine in the female child and effeminate in the male child might have appeared such tothe observers who have grown up amidst such gender protocols. But to these children theirgestures, their expressions were nothing contrary to their Sex. Thus gender roles as ascribedby the Society where the individual dwells, has great emphasis in building up the genderideas, the standards and the sexual esteems and biases of young humans who are born andnurtured here, irrespective of whether they are of the male or female sexual domain. The arguments from the “Nature” side of the controversy supports the discriminationbetween “Sex” and “Gender” with the help of medical science. Recent researches in thedomain of advanced Biology has come with the fact that the hormonal and brain developmentof individuals also have an impact on the behavioural trait of men and women (Mize, 2015).For instance the hormone, Testosterone, which is rich in Androgen and is present in themales, is greatly associated with aggressive and assertive behaviour that we usually associatemen with (Nasiruddin, 2013). Counter argument can come up that in such a case, womenshould be incapable of talking any aggressive or violent motif of action, which is definitelynot a reality. Thus Gender roles are again proven to be more a human manufactured mythwhile sex is definitely a reality that as well issues out of the hormonal and anatomicalconstruction of an individual. The greatest distinction that separates, “Gender” from “Sex”, asthe former is a social „effect? and the later is a biological „cause?. To conclude upon the distinction between the terms “Sex” and “Gender” it isnecessary that a mentioned is made of the definitions of these two terms as provided in therenowned Medical dictionary of Medilexicon. According to Medilexicon, “Sex” Personality Theories Assignment 6discriminates a man from a woman based upon the formations of their “Gonads”, theirchromosomal constitution, their morphology, as well as their hormonal constituency(Nasiruddin, 2013). While on the other hand, “Gender” is the category that the individualassigns to his own self or is made to assign to his own self by the sociological authorities whocontribute in his or her upbringing. The crux of this distinction between „sex? and „gender? thus dwells upon who a personis when born and who he becomes before he dies. The development of gender thus hardlydwells upon the fact that whether a person is born with testicles or with ovaries. Rather itconcentrates and developed based on who we associate ourselves with, or identify anddevelop ourselves as. The members of the Transgender community who reside parallelly withus in our societies have partial resemblances with both the biological sexes present in oursociety that does not necessarily mean that they are incapable to work, cook, act, speak orcarry out any other gender roles that are usually associated with the members of the twodominant genders (Nasiruddin, 2013). A person who comes to earth with testicles might notnecessarily prefer ascribing to the gender role associated with men or be matrimonially unitedwith a woman. That does not change his sex from a male to female, neither his capability toreproduce. It simply casts him as an antithesis to the contextual gender roles and not ananomaly. To free him from the same, it is time to change these gender roles instead ofmanipulating such individuals to change their „sex?."