Many debates have risen regarding the issue on whether its right to allow people to terminate the life of an ill patient freely on medical grounds. The topic has elicited different views with some still divided on how to go about it. It is due to the prevailing danger especially when loopholes exist. The healthcare industry is perhaps one of the most affected industries due to its role in the society. Despite working hard to comply with enacted laws, there is an increasing demand among terminally ill patients (Karaim & CQ Press, 2013). The paper takes an in-depth look at this issue while trying to come up with a concrete solution to the crisis.

Stringent measures are, however, needed to bring about a difference. Without such modalities in place, many stakeholders are likely to contravene the rights of people. For instance, it is not fair for one to end the life of another even on medical grounds. As a matter of fact, legal provisions limit people from engaging in such acts. Some, however, argue that this can help stop terminally ill patients from experiencing a lot of pain (McLean & Mason, 2003).Those found to engage in such risks being jailed as a result of this act. . On the other hand, according to religious circles, it is prone to attract negative sentiments largely because these patients have a right to live.

According to the Christianity perspective, taking human life is considered sinful. Some, however, believe only God has the overall authority over human life. Most people fear that failing to acknowledge such principals can lead to deterioration of the current state. Some are likely to commit it without regard to human life (Nakaya, 2005).

While recognizing the implication, it is wise to consider professionalism as a way to control the situation. It does not negate the idea of having great law provisions in place. Medical professionals are also expected to observe caution while going about their practice (McLean & Mason, 2003). Some quake professionals, however, thrive while taking advantage of existing gaps. In such instance, they are prone to collude with medical professions while hoping to end their life (Harris, 2008). Rarely does it imply that this is perhaps the only cause leading to such events, but can as well be attributed to other related issues. Withdrawal from relatives is also associated to result in stress among patients. Some think this is an easy way out now that they risk losing more resource while trying to provide the much-needed care. The issue is also due to inadequate support from relatives (Decision Resources, 2008).

It is important to acknowledge the right to protect human life. While thinking from an economic perspective, one is likely to justify this act but liable to misuse.  The debate, however, still demands a lot of caution owing to life being sacred.Introduction 

Many debates have risen regarding the issue on whether its right to allow people to terminate the life of an ill patient freely on medical grounds. The topic has thus  elicited different opinions with some still divided on how to go about it. It’s  largely due to the prevailing danger especially when loopholes exist. The healthcare industry is perhaps one of the most affected industries due to its role in the society. Despite working hard to comply with enacted laws, there is an increasing demand among terminally ill patients (Karaim & CQ Press, 2013). The paper thus  takes an in-depth look at this issue while trying to come up with a concrete solution to the crisis.

In every society, many questions are bound to arise; stringent measures are, however, needed bring  about a difference. Without such modalities in place, many stakeholders are likely to contravene the rights of people. For instance, it is not fair for one to end the life of another even on medical grounds. As a matter of fact, legal provisions limit people from engaging in such acts (McLean & Mason, 2003). Some, however, argue that this can help save terminally ill patients from enduring pain for years .

Legally, it’s  rarely acknowledged as a lawful act. Those found to engage in such risks being convicted for their actions . On the other hand, according to religious circles, it’s  prone to as well attract  negative sentiments largely because these patients have a right to live. According to the Christianity perspective, taking human life is considered illegal . Only God has the overall authority over human life . Most people fear that failing to acknowledge such principals can lead to degeneration from the current state to heightened levels . Some are likely to result to it with a  hidden motive without regard to human life (Nakaya, 2005).

While recognizing the implication;  it is wise to consider professionalism as a way to safeguard human life.  It doesn’t  negate the idea of having great law provisions in place. Medical professionals are also expected to observe caution while going about their practice (McLean & Mason, 2003). Some quake professionals, however, thrive while taking advantage of existing gaps. Patients are likely to desire to have their life taken away due to terminal illness. Some usually welcome this idea after being bedridden for years and thus may not even see the need to continue living.  In such instance, they are prone to collude with medical professions while hoping to end their life (Harris, 2008). Rarely does it imply that this is perhaps the only cause leading to such events, but can as well be attributed to other related issues. Withdrawal from relatives is also associated to result in stress among patients. Some think this is an easy way out now that they risk losing more resource while trying to provide the much-needed care. The issue is also due to inadequate support from relatives (Decision Resources, 2008).

Conclusion 

It is thus  important to acknowledge the right to protect human life. The issue continues to attract a lot of public debate with no solution being realized.  While thinking from an economic perspective, one is likely to justify this act (Harris, 2008).  Despite this being the case, some are bound to misuse it.  In other instance patients recovered from such conditions after being bedridden for years.  The debate, however, still demands a lot of caution owing to life being sacred.